This post is about a pet peeve: the Clinton campaign’s love affair with the phrase “raises serious questions.” Just once, I’d like a reporter to respond: You’ve told us so and so raises serious questions. What questions? How are they serious? And why all the serious questions from the ’solutions’ candidate?

Remember how, when Clinton was up against the ropes in her Bosnia lie, her campaign sent an email arguing that Obama has exaggerated his status as a Senior Lecturer by calling himself a Law Professor? Today the University of Chicago Law School made a statement that he wasn’t exaggerating–Obama was a professor.

So yes, Clinton was recently caught in a lie she’s been repeating for months about ducking sniper fire on the tarmac in Bosnia, part of her Commander-in-Chief credentials. Her handling and explanations of the lie are worse than the lie.

I received an email today (copied after the jump), which considers the facts that Obama is “from the east,” “charismatic in nature,” has “proposed solutions,” and has “attract[ed] many supporters,” and concludes that he must be the Anti-Christ. Question: Does the target demographic for this email even exist? Is there anyone out there who (a) is dumb enough to believe it and (b) was previously planning on voting Obama?

An obscure bit of political news, but another example of silly season: Philadelphia Mayor Michael Nutter takes offense to a memo written by Obama-strategist David Plouffe. Read the memo, however, and you discover that the offending language was nothing more than the suggestion that all states matter, not just Pennsylvania.

Analysis of the Mississippi exit polls shows that the Limbaugh-effect is real: conservative voters are crossing over in large numbers and voting for Hillary Clinton to cause chaos in the Democratic primary.

Debate highlight: Hillary Clinton draws a lame distinction between rejecting and denouncing that may depend on what the meaning of is is. Barack Obama does an awesome, whatever Hillary, I’ll use both words then.